The 2016-2021 Outlook for Dry Sour Cream Dairy Substitutes in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 274 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for dry sour cream dairy substitutes across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 3,500 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for dry sour cream dairy substitutes. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for dry sour cream dairy substitutes in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 33
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 44
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 45
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 45
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 46
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 47
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 47
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 48
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 49
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 50
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 51
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 52
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 54
4 GREAT LAKES 57
4.1 Executive Summary 57
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 58
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 59
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 63
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 68
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 69
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 70
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 73
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 74
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 76
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 79
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 80
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 83
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 87
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 88
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 89
5 MID-ATLANTIC 92
5.1 Executive Summary 92
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 94
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 95
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 95
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 96
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 97
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 97
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 98
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 99
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 101
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 105
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 106
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 110
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 114
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 115
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 119
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 125
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 126
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 129
6 NEW ENGLAND 132
6.1 Executive Summary 132
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 134
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 135
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 137
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 139
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 140
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 140
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 141
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 142
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 145
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 148
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 149
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 149
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 150
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 151
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 151
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 153
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 154
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 154
7 PLAINS 155
7.1 Executive Summary 155
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 157
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 158
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 159
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 160
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 161
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 162
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 163
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 164
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 166
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 168
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 169
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 170
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 173
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 174
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 174
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 175
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 176
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 176
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 177
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 178
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 178
8 ROCKIES 179
8.1 Executive Summary 179
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 180
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 181
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 182
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 184
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 185
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 185
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 186
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 187
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 187
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 188
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 189
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 190
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 191
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 192
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 192
9 SOUTHEAST 193
9.1 Executive Summary 193
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 195
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 196
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 197
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 199
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 200
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 201
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 202
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 203
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 208
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 214
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 215
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 218
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 221
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 222
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 223
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 224
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 225
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 226
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 228
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 229
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 230
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 231
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 232
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 234
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 236
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 237
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 238
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 240
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 241
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 242
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 244
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 245
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 247
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 250
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 251
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 251
10 SOUTHWEST 253
10.1 Executive Summary 253
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 254
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 255
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 256
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 257
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 258
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 258
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 259
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 260
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 261
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 262
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 263
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 268
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 273
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 273
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 274

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.