The 2016-2021 Outlook for Feed-Grade Dry Milk Products and Mixtures Shipped in Bulk in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 627 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for feed-grade dry milk products and mixtures shipped in bulk across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 10,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for feed-grade dry milk products and mixtures shipped in bulk. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for feed-grade dry milk products and mixtures shipped in bulk in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 45
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 64
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 65
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 67
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 69
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 70
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 71
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 72
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 73
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 76
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 80
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 81
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 88
4 GREAT LAKES 95
4.1 Executive Summary 95
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 97
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 98
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 110
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 122
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 123
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 128
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 134
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 135
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 142
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 150
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 151
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 162
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 173
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 174
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 180
5 MID-ATLANTIC 188
5.1 Executive Summary 188
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 190
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 191
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 192
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 193
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 194
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 194
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 195
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 196
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 202
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 208
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 209
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 218
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 228
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 229
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 247
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 265
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 266
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 282
6 NEW ENGLAND 298
6.1 Executive Summary 298
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 300
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 301
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 305
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 310
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 311
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 314
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 317
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 318
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 325
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 332
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 333
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 335
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 339
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 340
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 341
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 342
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 343
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 344
7 PLAINS 346
7.1 Executive Summary 346
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 348
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 349
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 353
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 357
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 358
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 361
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 364
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 365
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 371
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 377
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 378
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 384
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 390
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 391
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 392
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 395
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 396
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 397
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 398
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 399
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 400
8 ROCKIES 401
8.1 Executive Summary 401
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 403
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 404
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 408
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 412
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 413
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 414
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 416
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 417
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 418
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 420
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 421
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 424
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 427
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 428
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 429
9 SOUTHEAST 430
9.1 Executive Summary 430
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 432
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 433
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 437
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 442
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 443
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 446
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 449
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 450
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 464
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 479
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 480
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 487
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 494
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 495
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 499
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 503
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 504
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 508
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 514
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 515
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 518
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 521
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 522
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 529
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 536
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 537
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 541
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 546
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 547
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 552
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 557
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 558
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 563
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 568
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 569
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 571
10 SOUTHWEST 573
10.1 Executive Summary 573
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 574
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 575
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 578
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 581
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 582
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 583
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 586
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 587
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 590
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 594
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 595
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 610
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 626
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 626
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 627

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.