The 2016-2021 Outlook for Cocoa Butter Made from Cacao Beans in the United States

 Published On: Aug, 2015 |    No of Pages: 760 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for cocoa butter made from cacao beans across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for cocoa butter made from cacao beans. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for cocoa butter made from cacao beans in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 27
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 68
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 69
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 73
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 76
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 77
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 80
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 82
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 83
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 88
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 92
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 93
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 102
4 GREAT LAKES 110
4.1 Executive Summary 110
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 111
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 112
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 127
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 141
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 142
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 150
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 157
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 158
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 168
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 177
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 178
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 192
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 205
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 206
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 217
5 MID-ATLANTIC 227
5.1 Executive Summary 227
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 228
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 229
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 231
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 232
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 233
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 233
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 234
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 235
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 243
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 250
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 251
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 262
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 272
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 273
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 298
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 322
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 323
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 340
6 NEW ENGLAND 356
6.1 Executive Summary 356
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 357
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 358
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 364
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 369
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 370
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 376
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 381
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 382
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 392
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 401
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 402
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 407
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 411
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 412
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 414
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 415
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 416
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 420
7 PLAINS 423
7.1 Executive Summary 423
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 425
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 426
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 432
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 437
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 438
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 443
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 447
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 448
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 456
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 463
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 464
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 472
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 479
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 480
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 483
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 485
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 486
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 488
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 489
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 490
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 492
8 ROCKIES 493
8.1 Executive Summary 493
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 494
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 495
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 500
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 504
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 505
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 508
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 510
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 511
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 514
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 516
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 517
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 522
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 526
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 527
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 529
9 SOUTHEAST 530
9.1 Executive Summary 530
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 532
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 533
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 539
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 544
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 545
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 550
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 554
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 555
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 572
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 588
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 589
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 597
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 604
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 605
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 610
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 614
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 615
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 621
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 626
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 627
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 631
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 634
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 635
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 644
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 652
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 653
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 659
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 664
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 665
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 671
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 676
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 677
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 683
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 688
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 689
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 692
10 SOUTHWEST 694
10.1 Executive Summary 694
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 695
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 696
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 701
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 705
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 706
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 709
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 711
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 712
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 717
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 721
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 722
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 741
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 759
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 759
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 760

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.