The 2016-2021 Outlook for Whole Cornmeal for Human Consumption Made in Corn Mills in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 697 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for whole cornmeal for human consumption made in corn mills across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,000 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for whole cornmeal for human consumption made in corn mills. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for whole cornmeal for human consumption made in corn mills in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 73
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 74
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 76
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 77
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 78
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 83
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 87
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 88
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 96
4 GREAT LAKES 103
4.1 Executive Summary 103
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 104
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 105
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 118
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 130
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 131
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 138
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 144
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 145
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 154
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 162
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 163
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 176
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 188
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 189
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 197
5 MID-ATLANTIC 204
5.1 Executive Summary 204
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 206
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 207
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 209
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 210
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 211
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 211
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 212
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 213
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 220
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 226
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 227
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 237
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 246
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 247
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 267
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 286
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 287
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 304
6 NEW ENGLAND 320
6.1 Executive Summary 320
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 322
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 323
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 329
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 334
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 335
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 339
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 342
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 343
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 352
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 360
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 361
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 365
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 368
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 369
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 371
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 372
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 373
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 376
7 PLAINS 378
7.1 Executive Summary 378
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 380
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 381
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 387
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 392
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 393
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 397
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 400
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 401
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 408
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 414
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 415
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 422
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 428
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 429
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 432
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 434
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 435
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 437
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 438
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 439
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 441
8 ROCKIES 442
8.1 Executive Summary 442
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 443
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 444
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 449
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 453
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 454
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 457
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 459
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 460
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 463
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 465
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 466
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 470
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 473
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 474
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 476
9 SOUTHEAST 477
9.1 Executive Summary 477
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 479
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 480
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 486
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 491
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 492
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 497
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 501
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 502
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 518
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 533
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 534
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 542
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 549
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 550
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 555
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 559
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 560
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 566
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 571
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 572
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 576
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 579
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 580
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 588
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 595
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 596
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 602
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 607
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 608
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 614
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 619
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 620
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 626
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 631
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 632
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 635
10 SOUTHWEST 637
10.1 Executive Summary 637
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 638
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 639
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 643
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 646
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 647
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 650
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 652
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 653
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 658
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 662
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 663
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 680
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 696
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 696
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 697

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.