The 2016-2021 Outlook for Barber and Beauty Shop Furniture and Equipment Excluding Barber and Beauty Chairs in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 572 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for barber and beauty shop furniture and equipment excluding barber and beauty chairs across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 9,500 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for barber and beauty shop furniture and equipment excluding barber and beauty chairs. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for barber and beauty shop furniture and equipment excluding barber and beauty chairs in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 42
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 60
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 61
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 62
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 65
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 66
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 67
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 68
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 69
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 72
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 75
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 76
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 82
4 GREAT LAKES 88
4.1 Executive Summary 88
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 90
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 91
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 101
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 113
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 114
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 118
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 123
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 124
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 130
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 137
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 138
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 148
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 158
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 159
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 164
5 MID-ATLANTIC 170
5.1 Executive Summary 170
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 172
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 173
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 174
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 175
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 176
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 176
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 177
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 178
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 183
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 190
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 191
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 200
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 209
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 210
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 225
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 241
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 242
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 256
6 NEW ENGLAND 271
6.1 Executive Summary 271
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 273
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 274
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 278
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 283
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 284
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 286
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 288
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 289
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 295
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 303
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 304
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 306
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 309
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 310
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 311
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 312
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 313
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 314
7 PLAINS 315
7.1 Executive Summary 315
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 317
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 318
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 321
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 325
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 326
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 328
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 331
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 332
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 337
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 343
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 344
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 349
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 354
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 355
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 356
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 358
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 359
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 359
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 361
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 362
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 363
8 ROCKIES 364
8.1 Executive Summary 364
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 366
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 367
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 370
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 374
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 375
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 376
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 377
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 378
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 379
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 380
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 381
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 383
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 387
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 388
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 389
9 SOUTHEAST 390
9.1 Executive Summary 390
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 392
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 393
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 397
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 401
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 402
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 404
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 408
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 409
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 422
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 436
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 437
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 443
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 451
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 452
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 455
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 459
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 460
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 464
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 469
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 470
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 472
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 475
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 476
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 482
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 489
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 490
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 494
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 498
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 499
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 503
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 508
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 509
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 513
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 519
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 520
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 522
10 SOUTHWEST 524
10.1 Executive Summary 524
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 526
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 527
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 529
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 532
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 533
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 534
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 536
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 537
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 540
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 543
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 544
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 557
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 571
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 571
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 572

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.