The 2016-2021 Outlook for Hospital Patient Room Desks, Dressers, Over-Bed Tables, and Other Furniture Excluding Beds and Chairs in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 681 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for hospital patient room desks, dressers, over-bed tables, and other furniture excluding beds and chairs across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for hospital patient room desks, dressers, over-bed tables, and other furniture excluding beds and chairs. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for hospital patient room desks, dressers, over-bed tables, and other furniture excluding beds and chairs in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 45
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 66
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 67
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 69
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 71
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 72
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 73
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 75
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 76
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 80
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 84
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 85
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 92
4 GREAT LAKES 100
4.1 Executive Summary 100
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 102
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 103
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 116
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 129
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 130
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 136
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 142
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 143
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 151
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 160
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 161
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 173
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 186
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 187
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 195
5 MID-ATLANTIC 203
5.1 Executive Summary 203
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 205
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 206
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 207
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 208
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 209
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 209
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 210
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 211
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 217
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 224
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 225
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 234
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 245
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 246
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 267
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 289
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 290
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 306
6 NEW ENGLAND 324
6.1 Executive Summary 324
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 326
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 327
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 332
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 337
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 338
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 341
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 346
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 347
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 355
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 363
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 364
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 367
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 370
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 371
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 372
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 373
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 374
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 376
7 PLAINS 378
7.1 Executive Summary 378
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 380
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 381
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 386
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 391
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 392
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 395
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 399
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 400
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 406
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 414
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 415
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 421
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 428
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 429
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 431
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 433
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 434
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 435
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 436
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 437
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 438
8 ROCKIES 439
8.1 Executive Summary 439
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 441
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 442
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 446
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 450
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 451
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 452
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 455
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 456
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 457
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 460
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 461
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 464
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 467
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 468
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 469
9 SOUTHEAST 470
9.1 Executive Summary 470
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 472
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 473
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 478
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 483
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 484
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 487
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 491
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 492
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 507
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 523
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 524
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 531
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 538
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 539
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 543
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 547
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 548
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 553
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 558
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 559
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 562
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 565
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 566
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 573
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 582
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 583
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 587
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 593
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 594
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 599
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 605
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 606
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 611
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 616
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 617
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 619
10 SOUTHWEST 621
10.1 Executive Summary 621
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 623
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 624
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 627
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 631
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 632
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 634
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 636
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 637
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 641
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 645
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 646
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 663
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 680
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 680
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 681

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.