The 2016-2021 Outlook for Hollowware in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 668 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for hollowware across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of itís state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-ŗ-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for hollowware. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for hollowware in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 45
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 66
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 67
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 69
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 71
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 72
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 73
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 75
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 76
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 80
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 84
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 85
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 92
4 GREAT LAKES 100
4.1 Executive Summary 100
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 101
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 102
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 115
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 128
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 129
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 135
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 141
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 142
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 150
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 158
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 159
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 171
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 183
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 184
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 192
5 MID-ATLANTIC 200
5.1 Executive Summary 200
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 202
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 203
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 204
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 205
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 206
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 206
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 207
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 208
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 214
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 221
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 222
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 231
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 242
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 243
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 264
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 285
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 286
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 302
6 NEW ENGLAND 320
6.1 Executive Summary 320
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 322
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 323
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 327
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 333
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 334
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 337
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 341
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 342
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 350
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 358
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 359
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 362
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 365
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 366
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 367
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 368
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 369
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 371
7 PLAINS 373
7.1 Executive Summary 373
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 375
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 376
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 380
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 386
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 387
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 390
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 393
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 394
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 400
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 408
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 409
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 415
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 422
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 423
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 425
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 427
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 428
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 428
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 430
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 431
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 432
8 ROCKIES 433
8.1 Executive Summary 433
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 434
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 435
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 439
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 443
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 444
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 445
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 447
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 448
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 449
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 451
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 452
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 455
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 458
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 459
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 460
9 SOUTHEAST 461
9.1 Executive Summary 461
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 463
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 464
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 469
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 474
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 475
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 478
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 482
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 483
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 498
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 513
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 514
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 521
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 528
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 529
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 533
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 537
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 538
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 542
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 548
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 549
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 552
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 555
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 556
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 563
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 571
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 572
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 576
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 582
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 583
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 588
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 594
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 595
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 600
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 605
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 606
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 608
10 SOUTHWEST 610
10.1 Executive Summary 610
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 611
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 612
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 615
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 618
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 619
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 621
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 623
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 624
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 627
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 632
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 633
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 649
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 667
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 667
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 668

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.