The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wirebound Wood Boxes Made from Veneer and Plywood for Fruits and Vegetables in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 598 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wirebound wood boxes made from veneer and plywood for fruits and vegetables across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 9,000 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wirebound wood boxes made from veneer and plywood for fruits and vegetables. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wirebound wood boxes made from veneer and plywood for fruits and vegetables in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 44
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 61
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 62
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 65
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 67
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 68
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 70
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 71
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 72
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 76
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 79
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 80
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 87
4 GREAT LAKES 93
4.1 Executive Summary 93
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 94
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 95
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 106
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 116
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 117
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 122
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 126
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 127
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 134
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 140
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 141
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 151
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 160
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 161
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 167
5 MID-ATLANTIC 172
5.1 Executive Summary 172
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 174
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 175
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 177
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 178
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 179
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 179
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 180
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 181
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 188
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 194
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 195
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 205
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 214
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 215
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 230
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 245
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 246
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 261
6 NEW ENGLAND 275
6.1 Executive Summary 275
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 277
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 278
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 283
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 287
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 288
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 291
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 293
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 294
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 302
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 309
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 310
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 313
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 315
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 316
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 318
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 319
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 320
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 322
7 PLAINS 323
7.1 Executive Summary 323
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 325
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 326
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 330
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 333
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 334
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 337
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 339
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 340
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 346
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 351
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 352
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 358
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 363
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 364
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 367
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 369
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 370
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 372
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 373
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 374
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 376
8 ROCKIES 377
8.1 Executive Summary 377
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 378
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 379
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 383
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 386
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 387
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 389
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 390
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 391
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 393
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 394
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 395
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 399
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 402
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 403
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 405
9 SOUTHEAST 406
9.1 Executive Summary 406
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 408
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 409
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 414
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 418
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 419
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 423
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 426
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 427
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 441
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 454
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 455
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 463
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 470
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 471
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 475
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 478
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 479
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 484
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 488
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 489
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 493
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 496
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 497
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 504
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 510
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 511
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 516
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 520
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 521
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 526
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 530
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 531
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 537
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 542
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 543
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 546
10 SOUTHWEST 548
10.1 Executive Summary 548
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 549
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 550
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 554
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 557
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 558
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 561
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 563
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 564
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 568
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 571
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 572
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 585
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 597
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 597
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 598

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.