The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's and Children's Handbags and Purses Excluding Precious Metal, Leather, Plastic, and Vinyl Handbags and Purses in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 764 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's and children's handbags and purses excluding precious metal, leather, plastic, and vinyl handbags and purses across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,200 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's and children's handbags and purses excluding precious metal, leather, plastic, and vinyl handbags and purses. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's and children's handbags and purses excluding precious metal, leather, plastic, and vinyl handbags and purses in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 49
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 69
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 70
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 74
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 77
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 78
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 81
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 83
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 84
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 89
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 93
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 94
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 103
4 GREAT LAKES 111
4.1 Executive Summary 111
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 112
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 113
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 128
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 142
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 143
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 151
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 158
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 159
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 169
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 178
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 179
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 193
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 206
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 207
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 217
5 MID-ATLANTIC 226
5.1 Executive Summary 226
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 228
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 229
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 231
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 232
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 233
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 233
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 234
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 235
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 243
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 250
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 251
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 262
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 272
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 273
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 297
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 320
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 321
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 339
6 NEW ENGLAND 356
6.1 Executive Summary 356
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 358
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 359
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 365
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 370
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 371
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 377
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 382
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 383
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 393
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 402
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 403
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 408
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 412
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 413
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 415
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 416
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 417
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 421
7 PLAINS 424
7.1 Executive Summary 424
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 426
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 427
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 433
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 438
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 439
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 444
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 448
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 449
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 457
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 464
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 465
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 473
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 480
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 481
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 484
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 486
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 487
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 489
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 490
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 491
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 493
8 ROCKIES 494
8.1 Executive Summary 494
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 496
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 497
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 502
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 506
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 507
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 510
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 512
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 513
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 516
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 518
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 519
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 523
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 526
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 527
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 529
9 SOUTHEAST 530
9.1 Executive Summary 530
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 532
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 533
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 539
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 544
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 545
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 550
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 554
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 555
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 572
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 588
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 589
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 597
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 604
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 605
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 611
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 616
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 617
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 623
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 628
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 629
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 633
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 636
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 637
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 646
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 654
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 655
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 661
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 666
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 667
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 674
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 680
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 681
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 687
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 692
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 693
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 696
10 SOUTHWEST 698
10.1 Executive Summary 698
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 699
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 700
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 705
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 709
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 710
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 713
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 715
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 716
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 721
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 725
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 726
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 745
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 763
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 763
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 764

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.