The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Misses', and Girls' Full-Length, Knee-Length, and below the Knee-Length Sheer Finished Hosiery in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 786 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, misses', and girls' full-length, knee-length, and below the knee-length sheer finished hosiery across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, misses', and girls' full-length, knee-length, and below the knee-length sheer finished hosiery. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, misses', and girls' full-length, knee-length, and below the knee-length sheer finished hosiery in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 16
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 18
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 20
3.1 Executive Summary 20
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 22
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 23
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 26
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 28
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 29
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 51
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 72
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 73
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 77
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 80
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 81
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 84
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 86
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 87
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 92
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 96
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 97
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 106
4 GREAT LAKES 114
4.1 Executive Summary 114
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 116
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 117
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 132
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 146
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 147
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 155
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 162
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 163
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 173
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 182
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 183
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 198
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 212
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 213
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 224
5 MID-ATLANTIC 234
5.1 Executive Summary 234
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 236
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 237
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 239
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 240
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 241
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 241
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 242
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 243
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 251
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 258
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 259
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 270
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 280
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 281
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 307
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 332
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 333
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 351
6 NEW ENGLAND 368
6.1 Executive Summary 368
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 370
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 371
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 377
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 382
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 383
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 390
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 396
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 397
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 407
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 416
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 417
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 422
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 426
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 427
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 430
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 432
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 433
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 437
7 PLAINS 440
7.1 Executive Summary 440
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 442
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 443
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 449
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 454
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 455
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 460
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 464
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 465
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 473
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 480
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 481
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 489
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 496
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 497
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 500
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 502
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 503
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 505
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 506
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 507
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 509
8 ROCKIES 510
8.1 Executive Summary 510
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 512
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 513
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 519
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 524
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 525
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 528
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 530
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 531
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 534
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 536
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 537
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 542
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 546
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 547
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 549
9 SOUTHEAST 550
9.1 Executive Summary 550
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 552
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 553
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 560
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 566
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 567
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 572
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 576
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 577
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 594
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 610
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 611
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 619
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 626
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 627
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 633
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 638
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 639
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 645
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 650
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 651
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 655
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 658
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 659
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 668
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 676
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 677
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 683
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 688
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 689
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 696
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 702
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 703
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 709
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 714
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 715
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 718
10 SOUTHWEST 720
10.1 Executive Summary 720
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 721
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 722
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 727
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 731
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 732
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 735
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 737
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 738
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 743
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 747
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 748
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 767
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 785
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 785
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 786

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.