The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Misses', and Girls' Sheer Finished Elastomer Control Top Pantyhose and Tights without Leg Support in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 515 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer control top pantyhose and tights without leg support across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,000 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer control top pantyhose and tights without leg support. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer control top pantyhose and tights without leg support in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 41
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 55
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 56
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 59
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 61
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 62
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 64
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 65
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 66
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 70
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 73
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 74
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 80
4 GREAT LAKES 85
4.1 Executive Summary 85
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 87
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 88
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 97
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 105
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 106
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 111
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 115
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 116
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 122
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 127
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 128
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 136
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 143
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 144
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 149
5 MID-ATLANTIC 153
5.1 Executive Summary 153
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 155
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 156
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 158
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 159
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 160
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 160
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 161
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 162
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 168
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 173
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 174
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 183
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 191
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 192
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 204
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 215
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 216
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 227
6 NEW ENGLAND 237
6.1 Executive Summary 237
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 239
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 240
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 245
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 249
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 250
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 252
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 253
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 254
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 261
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 267
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 268
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 271
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 273
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 274
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 276
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 277
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 278
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 280
7 PLAINS 281
7.1 Executive Summary 281
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 283
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 284
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 288
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 291
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 292
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 295
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 297
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 298
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 303
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 307
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 308
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 313
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 317
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 318
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 320
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 321
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 322
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 324
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 325
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 326
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 328
8 ROCKIES 329
8.1 Executive Summary 329
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 331
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 332
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 336
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 339
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 340
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 342
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 343
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 344
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 346
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 347
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 348
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 351
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 353
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 354
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 356
9 SOUTHEAST 357
9.1 Executive Summary 357
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 359
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 360
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 364
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 367
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 368
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 371
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 373
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 374
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 385
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 395
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 396
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 403
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 409
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 410
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 414
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 417
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 418
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 422
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 425
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 426
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 429
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 431
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 432
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 438
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 443
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 444
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 448
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 451
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 452
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 456
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 459
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 460
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 465
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 469
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 470
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 473
10 SOUTHWEST 475
10.1 Executive Summary 475
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 476
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 477
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 480
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 482
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 483
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 485
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 486
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 487
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 490
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 492
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 493
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 504
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 514
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 514
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 515

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.