The 2016-2021 Outlook for General Freight Trucking in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 720 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for general freight trucking across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for general freight trucking. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for general freight trucking in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 13
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 14
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 14
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 15
1.4.1 Category Definition 15
1.4.2 Units 15
1.4.3 Methodology 16
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 18
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 19
3 FAR WEST 20
3.1 Executive Summary 20
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 22
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 23
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 27
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 69
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 70
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 72
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 75
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 76
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 77
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 79
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 80
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 84
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 88
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 89
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 96
4 GREAT LAKES 105
4.1 Executive Summary 105
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 106
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 107
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 121
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 135
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 136
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 142
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 150
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 151
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 160
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 169
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 170
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 183
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 197
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 198
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 208
5 MID-ATLANTIC 218
5.1 Executive Summary 218
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 220
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 221
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 222
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 223
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 224
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 224
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 225
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 226
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 232
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 239
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 240
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 249
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 260
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 261
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 286
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 312
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 313
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 330
6 NEW ENGLAND 347
6.1 Executive Summary 347
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 349
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 350
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 355
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 360
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 361
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 366
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 372
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 373
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 381
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 391
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 392
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 396
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 400
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 401
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 402
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 404
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 405
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 407
7 PLAINS 411
7.1 Executive Summary 411
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 413
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 414
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 419
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 424
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 425
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 428
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 432
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 433
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 440
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 447
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 448
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 454
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 461
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 462
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 464
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 466
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 467
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 467
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 469
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 470
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 471
8 ROCKIES 472
8.1 Executive Summary 472
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 473
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 474
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 478
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 482
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 483
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 484
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 487
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 488
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 489
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 492
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 493
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 496
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 500
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 501
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 502
9 SOUTHEAST 503
9.1 Executive Summary 503
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 505
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 506
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 511
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 517
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 518
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 521
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 525
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 526
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 542
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 558
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 559
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 566
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 573
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 574
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 578
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 583
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 584
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 589
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 594
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 595
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 598
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 601
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 602
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 609
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 618
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 619
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 624
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 629
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 630
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 635
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 641
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 642
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 647
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 652
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 653
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 655
10 SOUTHWEST 657
10.1 Executive Summary 657
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 658
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 659
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 662
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 667
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 668
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 670
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 672
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 673
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 677
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 681
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 682
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 700
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 719
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 719
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 720

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.